I think Im Dead wrote:I doubt there is a norm at all. I don't even think it qualifies as subjective. Subjective implies some sort of pattern or logic, I say that it's all made up BS.
#cough#....
No pattern? Usually a PC program increases from V1 to version 2 to version 3 etc... And they follow each other, 1 then 2 then 3 - not 3 then 1 then 2 then 8 then 15 then 2.5 then 6...
I think Im Dead wrote:If you want to release a QUEST V3000 ULTRA EXTREME LEGENDS!!!! It's completely up to you. All programmers make their releases according to whatever the hell they feel like, if you look at a lot of programs you'll see that.
Yes, you could release a Quest V3000 ULTRA EXTREME LEGENDS but it'd probably still carry a certain release version, perhaps 4 perhaps 5.... Maybe even 3000.... But still after that I seriously doubt you'd go to 2000 ULTRA MEGA RELEASE STAR SMASHER.... Just carrying the 2000 would put people off IMO!
Actually if you look at alot of programs they'll be pretty similar with
Minor changes, pretty different with
Major changes and only have bug updates with
Revision changes (the 'somthing' from my above post).
Yes it may be longer than 3 decimals, but that doesn't change anything...
I could have a release 3.2.456.3245.532 but that doesn't mean it doesn't follow a rule - the number increases, and usually by how much you change the program by.
The reasons behind the certain decimals are different for each programmer but there are usually two rules:
1. The placement decreases in importance (ie 3 (V - important) . 34 (Less important) . 342 (lower importance) etc...)
2. The number increases...
A name is totally different to a version number!!